E-File, but no E-Vote?

Happy Tax day, everyone. If you are one of millions who now E-File (Electronically file) your tax returns, I ask you to pause for a moment and think about what you have just done.

You transmitted all of your financial, personal, and tax information over the internet, safely and securely. I ask you a simple question? Did you give a second thought to it? I doubt it. Nor should you have.

In one of my first posts almost a year ago, “Imagine a world…”, I tried to point out how rapidly our world has changed from just a decade ago. We all remember how many important tasks in our lives we now do online, that only recently we took for granted must be done on paper.

Let’s face it, folks. E-Filing is another very strong example of the fact that security and privacy concerns over digital activities can be overcome to allow us to do amazing things online, without thinking twice about it.

Online voting is no different in this respect.

Remember, when you hear the vocal detractors (the self-declared experts) tell you that voting is different than banking, or Tax filing, or commerce, or even Air Traffic Control, that they are wrong when it comes to security, auditability, recountability, or privacy. Online voting is not “different”.

Voting IS very different from all these things in one very important respect. Voting is our most important RIGHT, from which all our other rights come. We should never allow ourselves to be denied the most contemporary technology to express that right.

If we “cyber the tax”, surely we can Cyber The Vote.

EmailFacebookTwitterYahoo MessengerAIMAOL MailGoogle GmailLinkedInMessengerYahoo MailShare
Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Great Suppressor…

Oh yes, I’m the great suppressor. Who am I? I am the polling place.

There is certainly a lot of talk these days about attempts to suppress the vote. Draconian photo ID laws, measures akin to poll taxes, restrictions to early voting and registration mechanisms. All these things have one thing in common: to deter certain voter demographic groups from voting in large representative numbers.

Most of these examples of vote suppression occur at the time of voting: It is when people show up to vote at the polling place that they are told their ID is unacceptable or that they can’t vote early or can’t register. The suppression happens at the polling place.

Those who enact these measures-state governors and legislatures-might rightly be referred to as “Suppressors”, who facilitate the disenfranchisement of voter rights at the polling place.

But by far the largest suppressor of the vote-The “Great Suppressor”- is the polling place itself.

Continue reading

EmailFacebookTwitterYahoo MessengerAIMAOL MailGoogle GmailLinkedInMessengerYahoo MailShare
Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Follow The Money

In my last post entitled “Polls, polls, and ‘Pols’”, I pointed out how our voting system, election system, and political system all disenfranchise the younger voter to the detriment of us all. I mention how the senior vote is targeted by Television attack ads. In this post I will delve further into those Television ads and why I believe online voting can do away with the stranglehold that the 30 Second TV spot has on our country.

“We must get money out of politics”. How often do we hear this plea lately? The concept that money has corrupted our political and governing system is being talked about all the time these days. To a great degree that is what both Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party have been about. The first step to getting money out of politics is to focus on where the money is going. Follow the money.

Many of us remember the Watergate era and the concept of “Follow the Money”. In that case, it involved understanding the bigger story around the Watergate break-in by “following the money” from where it was found -in the possession of the Watergate burglars-BACKWARD to where it came from-Richard Nixon.
Understanding how money really controls politics requires us to follow the money-FORWARD-from where it comes from to what it is spent on.

The path of money in politics is no mystery. Everyone knows how special interest money influences politics: By donating that money to the campaigns of elected officials. Everybody also knows what that money is primarily spent ON by those campaigns: Television advertising. The journey is a simple one. We all agree on this.

Political election campaigns are huge cash cows for media interests, which is one of the reasons why it is so difficult to get any traction for discussions that focus on reforming the dynamic of money in politics.

Instead of calling for constitutional amendments that would arbitrarily somehow remove money from politics, how about implementing changes in our voting system that remove the incentive for pouring so much money into our election campaigns?

If all the money goes to TV ads, let’s lessen the impact of those ads on our elections. Of course the next question is: how?
Continue reading

EmailFacebookTwitterYahoo MessengerAIMAOL MailGoogle GmailLinkedInMessengerYahoo MailShare
Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Polls, Polls, and “Pols”

Polls, Polls, and "Pols"

Poll: Place where people go to vote.
Poll: Survey of a sample of people, the results of which are usually extrapolated to indicate the opinions or preferences of a larger population.
“Pol”: Politician, elected official.

What do these homonyms have in common?

The polling place is and always has been the center of our election process. It is supposed to represent the very essense of democracy. When voters turn out, democracy is better served.

However, our history has proven time and again that not all of our citizens turn out for every election. In particular, young voters are almost never proportionately represented in voting results. Seniors “rule” when it comes to voting. One can speculate on the cause of this disparity. One can theorize that younger voters just aren’t as “engaged” as much as senior voters. Perhaps young voters just don’t appreciate the importance of voting as much as senior voters.

I don’t accept any of the above theories as explanation of why senior voters turn out in higher numbers. The reason for this disparity is obvious: retirees have more TIME to devote to going down to a polling place to vote than younger working voters. As a result our “polling place” system of voting has, and always will, result in disproportionate representation among voters.
Continue reading

EmailFacebookTwitterYahoo MessengerAIMAOL MailGoogle GmailLinkedInMessengerYahoo MailShare
Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

State-of-the-Art Online Voting: Cyber The Vote’s Interview with “Everyone Counts” CEO Lori Steele

Everyone Counts CEO Lori Steele on MSNBC, discussing last week's successful iPad voting in Oregon


Too often, critics of online voting are able to frame the discussion as a theoritical one regarding its viability. These critics tend to ignore the existence of companies that have been applying cutting edge technologies in the development of online voting systems for some time. These systems are being used, with great success and great cost savings to taxpayers, around the world.

One such major developer of online voting systems is Everyone Counts, an international company based in San Diego, California. When you consider the existence and use of the systems developed by Everyone Counts, you realize that highly secure online voting is anything but theoretical.
Continue reading

EmailFacebookTwitterYahoo MessengerAIMAOL MailGoogle GmailLinkedInMessengerYahoo MailShare
Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Online Voting vs. Paper – Papier est Passe

I have been meaning to post a comment regarding some of the words I hope will become obsolete in coming years: “Polling place”, “turnout”, “voter suppression” and “enthusiasm gap” to name a few.

I want to see all of these words become obsolete because I envision a time when online voting brings us not simply convenience, but unprecedented voter participation.

But the word that most needs to become obsolete with regard to our elections happens to be the thing that has rapidly become literally obsolete in the rest of our lives.

That thing is paper.
Continue reading

EmailFacebookTwitterYahoo MessengerAIMAOL MailGoogle GmailLinkedInMessengerYahoo MailShare
Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Online Voting Supporters – Time to be heard! – Sign the NEW Cyber the Vote petition!

Despite the presence of so much Anti Internet Voting noise, I KNOW that there is support out there for what online voting can achieve.

There are people like me out there, people who understand how online voting can transform our entire political system, by transforming our voting system.

I KNOW you are out there!

Well, it’s time to make your voices heard! Right here, and RIGHT NOW!

Sign the new Cyber The Vote petition. The petition with your signature will be sent, based on the State you indicate, to Secretaries of State ACROSS THE NATION, demanding that your voices be heard and that the will of the people be met.

Add your voice to the movement to empower us all.

After signing the petition, you will be sent a confirmation email to confirm your signature as real. (NO INFORMATION you enter will be used for any other purpose whatsoever.)

Time to get to work and protect our most important right – Our RIGHT to vote!

Thanks,

Rob
————————————–

Dear Secretary of State,

The signers of this petition ask that you recognize that their indisputable right to vote should be encouraged and accomodated by their state and election districts in every way possible, and that online voting is one of the best ways to achieve that.

We the undersigned ask you to work in every way possible to assure that election districts in your state who wish to adopt online voting are able to comply with all State election standards and requirements, without interference from the State, in a way that encourages voter participation in a substantial way as well as lowering election costs as much as possible to those districts.

Sincerely,

.

Name:

E-mail address:

Please enter an optional comment:

Do not display name on website:

EmailFacebookTwitterYahoo MessengerAIMAOL MailGoogle GmailLinkedInMessengerYahoo MailShare
Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Internet Voting News! California Passes Online Voter Registration! Great News for All American Voters!

On Friday, October 7th, 2011 the State of California took a great step in helping America bring it’s voting system out of the dark ages and into the Information Age!

California has passed an online voter registration law.

“This law will increase voter registration, increase the accuracy of the registration information, and reduce election costs,” said Mark Church, San Mateo County’s chief election officer.

It most certainly will. It will also help online voting advocates make our case that America’s voting system should be updated, as we are updating and transforming all other aspects of our lives, in a way that encourages full voter participation in our democracy. That means online registration AND online voting itself.

The arguments mounted by the Againsters are becoming more and more illogical. The arguments along with those who make the arguments are becoming as out of touch as our “polling place” voting system itself.

Great job, California!


EmailFacebookTwitterYahoo MessengerAIMAOL MailGoogle GmailLinkedInMessengerYahoo MailShare
Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Internet Voting: Cost-Benefit Analysis – They forgot the BENEFIT PART!

Online Voting

Cost-Benefit Analysis. Is there anything more basic? It’s like “supply and demand”. You don’t have to be an MBA to understand that with ANY undertaking (in ANY realm be it in business or politics or, gosh, even voting technology) the first thing you do is a cost-benefit analysis. You look at the cost or challenges and analyze them, strive to minimize them, and then you, just as diligently, look at the benefits of the undertaking, and how you could maximize them. Then you compare. Then you weigh. You weigh those two things against each other, and decide if the benefits of the undertaking are worth the risk. You don’t make that decision first, looking only at the risk. You don’t ever do that. Not if you are looking at something seriously.

When it comes to online internet voting, it’s like the joke of “where’s the beef?”.

What happened to the benefit part of the analysis???
Continue reading

EmailFacebookTwitterYahoo MessengerAIMAOL MailGoogle GmailLinkedInMessengerYahoo MailShare
Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Internet Voting Astroturf Detractors: Consider the Source – Beware the Againsters!

I mentioned in my last post, a piece about Dr. William Kelleher and his contributions to this movement, that I would be talking next about the “againsters”.

In fact, I have been working on the draft of this post for quite some time. It is one of the most important topics relating to the movement for Internet Voting, or any other grass roots movement for that matter.

Internet Voting could benefit society in countless ways, by increasing voter participation to levels we could only have dreamed of before the Information Age.

Any changes, however, that benefit the greater good will usually also impact some special interest in some way. In general, the more it will affect the general population for the better, the stronger the resistance will come from those special interests.

There are certainly plenty of important examples of this: The electric car, Green energy and even something as straightforward as climate scientists warning us about climate change, which they tell us has been brought about by industrialization and our overdependence on fossil fuels.

Internet voting is no exception. The very concept of voting online has many detractors because the result of Internet Voting would impact special interests. Special interests generally do not like democracy. Fascism by definition is rule by the corporate state.
Continue reading

EmailFacebookTwitterYahoo MessengerAIMAOL MailGoogle GmailLinkedInMessengerYahoo MailShare
Posted in Online Internet Voting Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments